Terminating Presidential Recess Appointments: A Reply to Professor Brian C. Kalt

Tillman, Seth Barrett (2007) Terminating Presidential Recess Appointments: A Reply to Professor Brian C. Kalt. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, 101. pp. 94-100.

[img] Download (59kB)

Add this article to your Mendeley library


This article replies to Professor Kalt's response to my opening article, "Senate Termination of Presidential Recess Appointments." I argue that as a simple straight forward textual matter the Senate majority can terminate a presidential recess appointment by terminating their session, i.e., the session that meets following a presidential intersession recess appointment. If the president makes an intrasession recess appointment (assuming such things have any constitutional validity at all), the Senate can terminate that appointment too - by terminating the current session, immediately reassembling, and then terminating the new session! I do not argue that American history or the Constitution's structure support this position, nor do I feel inclined to do so, where as here, the text is reasonably clear. I do, however, marshal some policy arguments to support the textual argument, although I frankly acknowledge that these arguments should not control the meaning of a constitutional clause.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: President; Congress; House; Senate; recess; adjourn; adjournment; appoint; appointment;
Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
Item ID: 2963
Depositing User: Seth Tillman
Date Deposited: 17 Jan 2012 17:50
Journal or Publication Title: Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy
Publisher: Northwestern University School of Law
Refereed: No

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Document Downloads

    More statistics for this item...