Terminating Presidential Recess Appointments: A Reply to Professor Brian C. Kalt


Tillman, Seth Barrett (2007) Terminating Presidential Recess Appointments: A Reply to Professor Brian C. Kalt. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, 101. pp. 94-100.

[img] Download (59kB)


Share your research

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn GooglePlus Email more...



Add this article to your Mendeley library


Abstract

This article replies to Professor Kalt's response to my opening article, "Senate Termination of Presidential Recess Appointments." I argue that as a simple straight forward textual matter the Senate majority can terminate a presidential recess appointment by terminating their session, i.e., the session that meets following a presidential intersession recess appointment. If the president makes an intrasession recess appointment (assuming such things have any constitutional validity at all), the Senate can terminate that appointment too - by terminating the current session, immediately reassembling, and then terminating the new session! I do not argue that American history or the Constitution's structure support this position, nor do I feel inclined to do so, where as here, the text is reasonably clear. I do, however, marshal some policy arguments to support the textual argument, although I frankly acknowledge that these arguments should not control the meaning of a constitutional clause.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: President; Congress; House; Senate; recess; adjourn; adjournment; appoint; appointment;
Academic Unit: Faculty of Social Sciences > Law
Item ID: 2963
Depositing User: Seth Tillman
Date Deposited: 17 Jan 2012 17:50
Journal or Publication Title: Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy
Publisher: Northwestern University School of Law
Refereed: No
URI:

    Repository Staff Only(login required)

    View Item Item control page

    Document Downloads

    More statistics for this item...